I came across this quote from the Apple’s founder, Steve
Jobs, in a Guardian article a few days ago:
“Simple can be harder than complex,” he said. “You have to
work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple. But it’s worth it in the end because once you
get there, you can move mountains.”
This echoes what I like about being a five element
acupuncturist. One of my catchphrases
when talking about my work is “the simpler the better”. We certainly do have to work hard for quite a
few years to get to the stage where we understand what it means to practise in
the simplest, purest way possible. This
was a skill which JR Worsley so beautifully mastered and passed on through his
teaching to us, his pupils.
I found it amusing and ironic, though, that the article in
which I found this quote was entitled “We are at the mercy of devices we don’t
understand”. It was all about how
incredibly complex the latest version of the i-phone which the writer had just
bought had become, so that he ended up losing much of his stored data because
he could not understand all the hidden instructions embedded in it. This seemed to be hardly the kind of “simple
device” which Steve Jobs had worked so hard to get his company to create.
But I like to think that our simple treatments can indeed
move mountains.
It is never good to ask a patient to tell you how they feel
at the end of a treatment. A question
such as this is usually a sign that we are looking to the patient to reassure
us that we are on the right track. Patients
are not there to reassure us; we are
there to reassure them that we know what we are doing. What a practitioner is really hoping with a
question like this is that the patient will tell them that they are feeling
marvellous.
In any case how can any of us put into words how we feel if
we are asked? There is so much involved
in our feeling anything, particularly something like the result of an
acupuncture treatment, when we are not sure what we are supposed to be
feeling. Being asked is therefore also
likely to worry us to different degrees depending on the kind of person we
are. I know that when I have been asked
this by some of the several practitioners who have treated me over the years,
the question has always thrown me. Being the
person I am, I try to be helpful to whoever is trying to help me, and
therefore I will think that I ought to say something complimentary as a way of
thanking them for their help, however untrue this may be. Other patients may think they ought to be
feeling something, but cannot detect any change at all, and therefore leave the
practice room disappointed.
A practitioner is the one who at the end of a treatment
should be observing their patient so closely that they will be able to judge if
the elements have responded in some way, always a sign of a good treatment (see
my last blog about this).
We are there to help our patients, not puzzle or worry them.
I always say that the work of a five element acupuncturist
starts within themselves. We should
always ask ourselves “How does this patient make me feel?” This feeling must then be linked to all the
many other feelings our patients have given us over the years, and which,
particularly in the cases of those patients we know we have treated
successfully, have added to the pointers to the different elements we have
gradually accumulated.
I have had a good example of this from a day I have just
spent in Switzerland
looking at six patients with two five element practitioners. It was a productive day, as these days
usually are. I am with people who are keen
to learn as much as they can from me, and I have to offer them as much of my
expertise in diagnosing the elements and working out a treatment schedule as I
can. So days such as these are always
challenging for me, because, unlike when I am in my own practice, I feel
compelled to get my diagnoses right in such a short space of time, otherwise I
will feel that I am wasting my host practitioners’ time (and money!). In that sense, a day like this, as with any
seminars I have run, has its own particular stress.
It is by close observation of any changes at the end of each
treatment that I receive some confirmation that we are on the right elemental
path. Changes can range from being quite
obvious to being so subtle that I am sure that I would not have seen them in
years gone by. Yesterday, for example, I observed two quite clear colour
changes, one in a Wood and the other in an Earth patient, and a third patient
looked much more relaxed and was communicating more easily with us. There were also marked changes to how I felt
about the fourth and fifth patients, as though I sensed that my relationship to
them had shifted as their elements responded to treatment.
Finally, the sixth patient blessed our day by putting the
change he felt into words, such a rarity, and valued all the more for
that. This was a young man I diagnosed
as Water, who was coming for his first treatment. After his AE drain and his Kidney and Bladder
source points, he stood up and said, with great surprise in his voice, “My feet
feel as though they are touching the ground quite differently.” I love the thought of the Water element sending good energy to connect him with the earth beneath his feet in
this way.
This reminded me of what two of my Water patients told me
after I had needled IV(Ki)1 on the sole of the foot. Both said that they felt a rush of energy
like a fountain pouring up their body. I remember thinking what an appropriate
name for a point this was, Bubbling Spring, confirmation that the ancient
Chinese really did understand the actions of the points they named.
I find it both interesting and rather disturbing to
note a fashion statement which reveals very clearly some of the confusion there
still exists among even the brightest and most obviously liberated of women in
relation to their footwear. I am not a
historian of fashion, but it is obvious even to my untutored eyes that the very
high heels all professional women now wear appear to be a statement of what is
called power dressing, because it is in these circles where these high heels are
usually accompanied by extremely elegant suits with very short, tight skirts,
revealing as much leg as possible accentuated by the height of the heels.
Rather incongruously the wearers remind me of girls from a Folies Bergรจre chorus line. It is as though we are being sent two quite conflicting
messages: the first, the ostensible one, the image of the successful woman in
whatever career she has chosen, whether as a BBC journalist or a city banker,
and the second, hidden beneath this one, a much more sexually explicit
invitation of availability.
I remember some years back the uproar caused by an employee
at Harrods being forced by the management to wear higher heels than she wanted
to. Now the height of heels has become
so entrenched in what women feel they should be wearing to work that it would
probably cause an equal outcry if somebody appeared on our TV screens wearing
flat shoes.
This was driven home to me most forcibly when I observed
that most down-to-earth BBC presenter, Clare Balding, sitting uncomfortably in
the TV studio wearing the most ridiculously high-heeled shoes for somebody of
her sturdy build. I always think of her
as striding through the countryside wearing gumboots or flat sensible
shoes. The same thought occurred to me
when I saw the BBC announcer, Gaby Logan, at the recent World Athletics
Championship tottering over to a screen in the most uncomfortable
looking, but undoubtedly highly fashionable high heels I had ever seen. It somehow seemed a sad example of women’s
almost schizophrenic approach to fashion that, at an athletics meeting where
all the young girls wear the most comfortable trainers they can possibly find,
the BBC announcer commenting on the races felt compelled to wear the most inappropriate
shoes.
I watch business women coming out of their offices,
taking off their high heels, reaching into their bags and with relief putting
on their trainers to make the journey home in comfort. For the working day they
must have squeezed their toes into shoes which my chiropodist says are
crippling more and more of their feet. What a sad indictment of women’s slavery
to fashion, and something that at one level can almost be seen as mimicking a
return to the days of bound feet in China!
As a postscript to this, I have just heard Alexandra Shulman,
Ex-Editor of Vogue, talking on BBC Radio 4 this morning. She said that wearing high heels for her is
like “being a bit more in control.” How
interesting!
Finally, Ivanka Trump can apparently see nothing
incongruous in squelching across storm-soaked grass in high heels from the
aircraft when accompanying her husband on a flying visit to hurricane-battered Houston.