Saturday, December 11, 2010

Did points come before meridians, or meridians before points?

I find it is interesting to speculate whether the concept of meridians came first, and then the points, as it were, popped up along them afterwards, or whether it was the other way around. Were the points there first and somebody (who?) joined them up, like some dot-to-dot picture our children trace? Historically, as I know from my translations of Elisabeth Rochat de la Vallée’s work on the points, there is disagreement as to which meridians certain points were allocated to, and uncertainty as to the lines of the meridians, which were not as firmly fixed as they are now. This would appear to indicate that points came before meridians, but there is obviously no clear answer to any of this. Speculation about this is, however, worthwhile because it prevents us from being too rigid in our thinking, and encourages us to look at things from a different angle, always a good idea if our thoughts are not to atrophy.


  1. Hi Nora,

    Can you please tell us what Elisabeth Rochat de la Vallée’s work on the points you are referring to?

  2. In answer to T'ai Chi: I am at the moment translating Elisabeth’s commentaries on what is written in classical texts about what she calls the Heart Master meridian (Heart Protector, Pericardium) and its 9 points. I am translating this from French into English, and am so far up to point 8 out of the 9. It is fascinating work, and opens another door on to what we do. This will eventually be published as another of her books.